Safe suprapancreatic lymph node dissection for gastric cancer with ectopic common hepatic artery.

Suprapancreatic lymph node dissection for patients with gastric cancer in whom the common hepatic artery is located neither at the suprapancreatic margin nor in front of the portal vein is a more difficult procedure than when the common hepatic artery is in a more typical position. There is an increased risk of injury to the vessels that need to be preserved and inadequate lymph node dissection. Measures that have been reported for use in this situation are preoperative diagnosis with three-dimensional computed tomography angiography, dissection using the portal vain as a guide, and safe exposure of the portal vein with dissection to preserve the nerves at the suprapancreatic margin and in front of the portal vein. We review the literature and report our experience with a patient whose common hepatic artery was not located in the suprapancreatic margin who safely underwent suprapancreatic lymph node dissection using these methods.

Follicular lymphoma without lymphadenopathy incidentally diagnosed by sentinel lymph node biopsy during breast cancer surgery: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent breast cancer and malignant lymphoma is a rare phenomenon. This report describes malignant lymphoma that was incidentally diagnosed from a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) during breast cancer surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old woman with a history of ovarian cancer and diabetes presented with right focal asymmetric density on a mammogram acquired during routine breast cancer screening. Ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a 13.5-mm tumor in the upper lateral region of the right breast. A US-guided Mammotome biopsy revealed invasive ductal carcinoma of the right breast. Preoperative assessments including positron emission tomography-computerized tomography, found no evidence of axillary lymphadenopathy or distant metastasis. Because the breast cancer was stage I, the patient underwent a right mastectomy and a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) at our hospital. Pathological assessment of the biopsy revealed follicular lymphoma (FL), but no metastatic breast cancer. The patient was referred to hematology to stage the FL. Bone marrow findings were negative and stage I FL was diagnosed. After the mastectomy, she was monitored and given adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: Follicular lymphoma was incidentally diagnosed from an SLNB obtained to determine the dissemination of early-stage breast cancer. Collaboration with hematologists is important to determine optimal treatment plans for such patients regardless of the rarity of such events.

The prognostic impact of peritoneal washing cytology for otherwise resectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients.

The clinical importance of peritoneal washing cytology (PWC) for cholangiocarcinoma patients remains unclear. The clinical data of 137 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients who received PWC and curative surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Among the 137 patients analyzed, five (3.6%) had positive PWC, and 132 (96.4%) had negative PWC. The median survival time in patients with negative PWC was 6.45 years, and the overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 86.5%, 75.3%, and 51.6%, respectively. The median survival time in patients with positive PWC was 2.56 years, and the overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 60.0%, 60.0%, and 40.0%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that positive lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), positive perineural invasion (P = 0.014) and no use of adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001), but not positive PWC were independently associated with a worse overall survival. In conclusion, surgery and subsequent chemotherapy might be a therapeutic option for cholangiocarcinoma patients with positive PWC.

[Abdominoperineal Resection for Anal Metastasis of Rectal Cancer].

Anal metastasis of colorectal cancer is rare, and no standardized effective therapeutic strategy exists. We report a case of abdominoperineal resection for anal metastasis of rectal cancer. A 65-year-old man underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer in August 2013. Histopathological examination revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma( tub2, pSS, ly3, v2, pN1, H0, P0, M0, Stage III a, Cur A). In February 2015, he complained of anal discomfort, and tumor markers were elevated. Enhanced CT revealed a 15-mm high-density solid tumor in the anal canal. The results of needle biopsy indicated a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. This tumor was suspected to be metastasis from rectal cancer, and we performed abdominoperineal resection. Histopathological examination revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, which was the same histological type as the primary rectal cancer and was covered with normal anal epithelium. Collectively, the findings indicated anal metastasis from rectal cancer. The patient is alive without recurrence for 18 months after resection. Anal metastasis should be considered as a differential diagnosis in patients with anal discomfort who have a history of colon/rectal cancer. Abdominoperineal resection may be an effective treatment modality for this condition.